Oh! Do not get me started on people contacting me with questions about marketing and then, when I answer them, they say, ‘Oh! I did not realise it was such hard work’
It is not hard work. Actually most of it is moderately easy. It is, however, time consuming. (perhaps that is what they meant) and hey, yeah, I get the stomach churning knowledge that you just have not got time for that shit. I feel the same way!
However, several times a week I get specific queries about keywords (tags) and descriptions. Those are the nice easy part, (unless you do abstract and then they are the pits of despair. Just how do I add 500 characters to a pink and blue smudge, guys?)
So basically this post is a rehash of a couple of older ones as not a lot has changed really. You should enjoy this part of your image uploading as this is, truly, the easy bit. Much easier than sitting in that swamp waiting for the one shot of a crocodile with a butterfly on his nose.
I am going to add proper, real marketing posts shortly…….when I get time
IPTC
Fill out your IPTC on all your images. It is the good way of making sure you stay with your work. Wherever that image travels the IPTC will travel with it.
My programme of choice is Irfanview. I have been using it for years and it does just what you want it to, plus a little extra I have never used.
Use it. If you upload to lots of sites then it is an absolute beauty and the best thing you have loaded all year.
Written by Irfan Skiljan it is freeware for non-commercial use and you just donate to support it
KEYWORDS/TAGS
Need, must have. Not hashtags. Keywords. These are words that fit that image. Not a lot of images, just that one image. eg….
You have visited London and have one image of Trafalgar Square, one of Big Ben, one of St Pauls
london, england and uk would fit all, but trafalgar square only fits one, big ben only fits one and st pauls only fits one. You do not add trafalgar square,big ben,st pauls to all of them.
DESCRIPTIONS
Google doesn’t like keywords. Google humans realised that site owners were spamming keywords to get them higher in searches.
Google likes descriptions which answer questions.
If you load an orange butterfly, tell Google that you have loaded an orange butterfly, what that butterfly is doing and where it is doing it.
Google is your blind viewer. You have to describe the work, so that the blind viewer can then go on to describe it to others.
Fancy-dancy descriptions are cool. I do them all the time…in fact I have not listened to much of my own advice on a lot of images and they are the ones that do not sell. However, Google is not going to read ALL your description so 2 major rules for them
- Keep them honest, just like the keywords. If they are not, then Google WILL remove you from all searches, or shove you to the bottom.
- Keep the actual image description at the top and the fancy-dancy under that. eg; Orange butterfly landed on a pink flower….. Oh I wish I was a butterfly, cool breeze ruffling my wings…. etc etc
- I forgot the 3. In your description make sure to add at least three of the main ‘key’ words. ‘orange’, ‘butterfly’, and ‘pink’ or ‘flower’ are the three from my description and they should also be at the front of my keywords.
- DAMN! There are 4!! Some search engines will only read the first TEN keywords. and the first 30 words of your descriptions. So those are the main, most important ones. Google is not the only search you are aiming to get on.
- Just kidding. There is no 5…… no, there isn’t…..is there? No!
Ok. Any questions ask someone….. just kidding! Ask in the comments below
Hope this helps
[table id=registerpost /]
This is very informative. I am embarrassed to say I did not know what IPTC was. I will now do that to my images. Thank you for this post.
Never be embarrassed about what you don’t know… Now you do 🙂 Glad I could help!
Great article and spot on. Bookmarked!
Glad it helped!!
I too did not know what IPTC was. So googled. When I followed your link to Ifanview it gave me heaps of options to download from.
Any suggestions I’m on a Mac.
Thanks again Abbie,
Ok he doesn’t do a Mac version .. I’m looking for alternatives that are safe for you. Lightroom does it. But I think that’s costly. Give me a few hours
I’m interested too, as I also have a Mac. Thank you.
Did you see my reply above.. that’s a link from the IPTC site and shows most of the alternatives xx
https://iptc.org/standards/photo-metadata/software-support/
Lol. You crack me up with your honest, to the point, funny posts. Thank you for the information. It matters!! 😁
You’re very welcome, lol
I figured it out! I googled it and after a few tries, I found one I could totally understand for my version of Photoshop. Yea. Thanks so much.
Awesome!